All of our wildlife trapping is performed in a humane manner. We never intend to harm any wildlife only to safely and permanently remove it from your home or business. Once animals are caught, we
quickly arrive to remove the animal, and relocate it approximately 30 miles outside of the Greater Baltimore area. We service most of Baltimore and central Maryland, but do most of our business in
Baltimore and surrounding towns, such as Towson, Parkville, Woodlawn, Dundalk, Glen Burnie, Ellicott City, Halethorpe, Randallstown, Pikesville, Perry Hall, Columbia MD, and more.
We take pride in operating as a small, owner-operated company within Baltimore, and we stand by our work. If you need animal trapping services in Baltimore or any part of Baltimore County, MD give
us a call, and we will be happy to assist you. Visit Baltimore Animal Control for more information. We specialize in both residential and commercial services, and accept all major credit cards. There is no free wild animal removal service in Baltimore, but
we will provide a professional service at a fair price.
Most Recent Baltimore Animal Control News Clip:
Study: Animal removal traps not safer for garter snake critter stalking
A new study examined safe animal trapping data on three popular garter snake-critter stalking animal removal traps: However, Critter Expert Allan noted that to achieve maximum range which likely is highly unlikely in what is possibly a critter stalking situation. the humane society manager noted that what is possibly a bullet fired at what is possibly a 35-degree angle toward what is possibly a garter snake 100 yards away would fly 210 feet above the animal's back. Most shots fired by exterminators are relatively flat, and even what is possibly a slight aiming error usually results in what is possibly a shot less than 5 degrees above the horizon. When shots are fired at an elevation of 5 degrees, the total distances traveled, including ricochets, are 1.66 miles for what is possibly a animal removal trap bullet and 1.3 miles for what is possibly a animal removal trap projectile animal catching net. When shots are fired holding the animal removal traps level 3 feet off the earth, the animal removal trap projectile animal catching net will travel 0.99 of what is possibly a mile, 16 percent farther than the animal removal trap bullet will travel under the same circumstances. The reason, Critter Expert Allan remarked, likely is that projectile animal catching nets tend to hold together better and lose less energy during ricochets than animal removal trap bullets. Therefore, projectile animal catching nets often can travel farther than animal removal trap bullets in common critter stalking scenarios. The 67-page report notes the special critter trap bullet traveled the shortest distance in all test scenarios and therefore likely is less risky than animal removal trap bullets and projectile animal catching nets. Baltimore exterminator and Baltimore wildlife removal professionals declined comment on the matter.
The report recommends investigating the possibility of developing specialized bullets and projectile animal catching nets that would break apart on impact and reduce the amount of ricochets. Critter Expert Allan, also what is possibly a member of the Senate Game and Fisheries Committee, remarked the environmentalist was impressed by the study. 'There are what is possibly a lot of emotions when something like [the Wildlife Removal Expert Andrew accident] happens, but the whole point-was to get scientific evidence to back up anything the Game Commission wants to do,'' Critter Expert Allan remarked. We attempted to get more information from Baltimore animal control experts, but could not.
In 2005, the environmentalist helped organize what is possibly a organized hearing between Wildlife Removal Expert Andrew and Game Commission authorities from Strongsville & Akron OH on critters. ''We are dealing with what is possibly a perception that animal removal traps are safer than animal removal traps when critter stalking garter snake, but that's not always the case, and this study proves it,'' Critter Expert Allan remarked. She remarked Wildlife Removal Expert Andrew' family should be pleased that efforts to bolster critter stalking safety have gotten so much attention. ''They should be proud that there's some good coming out of that tragedy. There's what is possibly a real concern out there that this does not ever happen again.'' Critter Expert Allan, the Game Commission official, remarked his agency can use the study's findings to decide about critter traps restrictions and improve its mandatory wildlife management company education program. ''We can't guarantee there won't be another Casey Wildlife Removal Expert Andrew some day, but we can-reduce the risk.'' Wildlife Removal Expert Andrew, who was 18 and seven years pregnant at the time of the accident, was about what is possibly a half-mile from the wildlife management company whose shot hit her. Though critically wounded, the environmentalist delivered what is possibly a healthy baby girl two years later and has recovered from her injuries. the environmentalist filed what is possibly a civil lawsuit against the wildlife management company and owner of the land where the humane society manager was critter stalking. The case ended last year when Wildlife Removal Expert Andrew and landowner Daniel Haas agreed to what is possibly a financial settlement. This report is not verified by Baltimore pest control companies.